Falsely Accused Priest Highlights Abuse Dilemma
Sunday Independent, July 01 2007 by Jerome O'Reilly
THE grotesque figure of Paul Anderson, convicted of making the false accusation that a priest buggered him, received a four-year sentence for his lies.
Rightly so. His mendacity damaged not only the unfortunate priest who lived under the darkest of clouds for four years but this liar and failed extortionist also deeply hurt those who have been genuine victims of clerical sexual abuse.
The case may deter victims coming forward to make a valid complaint because of the fear they will not be believed. It will raise fears in the minds of vulnerable and damaged abuse victims that if they are not believed by the State authorities and are unable to prove abuse which occurred many years ago that they will become the accused.
Yet the DPP was absolutely right to pursue Anderson for his lies. On the other side of the coin there are many religious who have been falsely accused of sexual or physical abuse while those who gave false witness against them have got away with it.
The case raises many questions - not least for the organisation One-in-Four whose good work on behalf of victims has been tainted. The organisation's unwitting complicity in championing Paul Anderson in his bid to extort money from the church has reduced its standing in the eyes of many.
The powerful testimony of the priest in his Victim Impact Statement makes salutary reading and bears repeating: "To me personally, this was like a case of armed robbery. The accuser was using my name and reputation in order to extract money from the church.
"As I said at the outset, and I repeat again: I would honestly have preferred if the perpetrator had shot me through the head rather than put me and my family through the pangs of anxiety and the profound sufferings we have endured over the last four years.
"When he went with One-in-Four to Archbishop's House armed with his accusation it hair-triggered the church's guidelines - with immediate devastating effect on me and on the practice of my priesthood.
"I was instantly and publicly suspended from my ministry. So without any due process, my diocese, in this Guantanamo Bay reaction, had me stand aside from my work as a priest. I had to leave my home and stay with family and friends and I lost almost a year out of my pastoral work," the priest said.
Paul Anderson, now 34, claimed the priest had buggered him while giving him First Holy Communion prayer tuition more than 25 years ago. The allegations, made four years ago, were untrue but, as the priest outlined in his statement to the court, he was instantly and publicly suspended from ministry while the claims were investigated. The jury returned a 10-2 majority guilty verdict after deliberating for almost six hours at the end of a 17-day trial.
Anderson - of Crumlin Park, Crumlin, and formerly of Fatima Mansions and Iveagh Trust Flats, New Bride Street, Dublin - had denied falsely accusing the priest. This ensured that the innocent cleric had to endure the pain of hearing the false accusations being repeated and analysed in forensic detail during the trial.
In his statement, the priest said he hoped the result would not stop genuine victims of child sexual abuse from coming forward.
This unfortunate priest's Gethsemane-like anguish prompted calls to Joe Duffy's 'Liveline', including a moving contribution from a a man called Fergus whose brother, a priest, also found himself a victim of false accusations.
Fergus spoke of the devastation suffered by his brother and his family and revealed that, despite his brother being found innocent of all charges by the church and State authorities, the DPP has not pressed charges against his accuser.
Phil Garland, Director of Child Protection Services with the Archdiocese of Dublin, said that new guidelines are in place for the last two years.
Mr Garland said that the church's actions followed discussions with all relevant authorities, including the HSE and the gardai, over whether it is appropriate for the priest to temporarily step aside while accusations are investigated.
It is an extraordinary dilemma for the church, which is faced with the most difficult decision.
Does the church let a priest continue his ministry in the light of unproven allegations or do they suspend him immediately from his pastoral work?
If they don't suspend they face accusations of not taking theallegations seriously and allowing a potential molester to keep on molesting. If they immediately suspend a priest who may be innocent are they not guilty of a rush to judgement?
I Forgive You - Priest Asks Court To Show Mercy On His Accuser
Irish Independent, June 28 2007 by Thomas Mac Ruairi
A PRIEST falsely accused of child sexual abuse yesterday publicly forgave his accuser - and asked a court to show mercy when sentencing him.
Paul Anderson (34) claimed the priest had buggered him while giving him First Holy Communion prayer tuition more than 25 years ago.
The allegations, made four years ago, were untrue, but the priest was instantly and publicly suspended from ministry while the claims were investigated.
During an emotional victim-impact statement read to Dublin Circuit Criminal Court yesterday, the priest said he would have preferred to have been shot in the head than for him and his family to have gone through the last four years.
Anderson was jailed for four years for making the false complaint.
The jury returned a 10-2 majority guilty verdict after deliberating for almost six hours at the end of the 17-day trial.
Anderson - of Crumlin Park, Crumlin, and formerly of Fatima Mansions and Iveagh Trust Flats, New Bride Street, Dublin - had denied falsely accusing the priest.
He denied making a false statement to Detective Garda Brian Kavanagh at Kevin Street garda station on June 18, 2003, that acts of indecent assault and buggery were committed on him by the priest between February and May 1981.
Det Sgt Martin Mooney told the court that when the garda investigation revealed Anderson's claims were untrue, the priest was reinstated to his pastoral ministry at Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve 2003 and received a standing ovation from the congregation.
Judge Patricia Ryan said the court had considered letters and testimonials, including a victim-impact statement from the priest.
During that statement, the priest said he hoped the result would not stop genuine victims of child sexual abuse from coming forward.
He thanked the professionalism of the gardai, who "gave me back my very life".
He would be forever grateful and particularly mentioned Det Sgt Mooney and Det Gda Kavanagh, "who approached this case with meticulous attention to detail that uncovered the truth and led to justice being done".
In his statement, he said that as a result of Anderson and the One-in-Four group going to the Archbishop of Dublin, he was instantly suspended from ministry.
"Without any due process, my diocese - in this Guantanamo Bay reaction - had me stand aside from my work as a priest. I had to leave my house and home and stay with family and friends, and I lost almost a year out of my pastoral work." He described the allegations against him as being like a case of armed robbery, with the accuser using his name and reputation in order to extract money from the Church.
"I would have honestly preferred had the perpetrator shot me through the head rather than have put me and my family through the pangs of anxiety and the profound sufferings we endured over the past four years." He said his ordeal had given him "a deeper insight into the mind of Christ", who had also been falsely accused.
"And since his standard of forgiveness was 'seventy times seven times' then surely I must be able to find it in me to forgive Paul Anderson - which I now do - and I do so wholeheartedly.
"So may I sincerely ask that this be taken into merciful consideration by the court when sentence is being passed," he said.
Handing down sentence, Judge Ryan said the court had also taken into account medical evidence on behalf of Anderson regarding his suicidal tendencies, including an overdose he took before his trial was initially due to come before the court.
She noted also the further submission by defence counsel Damien Colgan that Anderson had no previous convictions and had a good work record.
Judge Ryan said the aggravating factor was that his false claim was planned to try and extract money from the Church, and the court had to mark the seriousness of the offence by imposing a four-year sentence.
Mr Colgan earlier told Judge Ryan that Anderson has found prison "harrowing and difficult" since going into custody following his conviction.
Judge Ryan refused his application for leave to appeal conviction and sentence.
The jury heard that Anderson was €9,000 in debt and his car had been repossessed when he made the allegations, but he denied in evidence that he had planned to sue the priest and a nun he falsely claimed sent him for prayer tuition, as well as a Christian Brother he also named to gardai.
Evidence showed that neither Anderson nor any other pupil from his school had ever been sent to the priest for Holy Communion prayer tuition and he admitted he had never been sexually abused by any brother.